[cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?

[Peter Bowen]

How about this?

Ballot XXX - Sunset of exceptions

The following motion has been proposed by ______________ of _________ and endorsed by __________ of _________ and _________ of _________.

-----BEGIN MOTION-----

1) Modify section 6.1.7 of the Baseline Requirements to add items 5(f) and 5(g) which read:

f. The CA signs the Subscriber Certificate on or before June 30, 2016 

g. The notBefore field in the Subscriber Certificate has a date on or before June 30, 2016

2) Modify section 6.3.2 of the Baseline Requirements to replace the words "Beyond 1 April 2015" with the words "Until 30 June 2016"

-----END MOTION-----


> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Eddy Nigg <eddy_nigg at startcom.org> wrote:
> 
> Dito.
> 
> On 01/20/2016 01:25 AM, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
>> I’m happy to make the motion or endorse removal of these exceptions. 
>>   <>
>> From: public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org>] On Behalf Of Peter Bowen
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:09 PM
>> To: Ryan Sleevi
>> Cc: CABFPub
>> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?
>>  
>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com>> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com <mailto:pzb at amzn.com>> wrote:
>> The BRs contain at least two allowances for “legacy” certificate issuance:
>> 
>> 6.1.7 (5) allows direct issuance of subscriber certificates from a root CA
>> 
>> 6.3.2 allows certificates with validity periods longer than 39 months
>> 
>> Are these still needed?  Are CAs relying upon these exceptions?  If not, does it make sense to ballot to remove these from the BRs?
>>  
>> Peter, I'd be happy to support a ballot if you want to propose one. That tends to be the only way to get timely responses - the discussion period of the ballot. 
>>  
>> As an Associate Member, I cannot propose ballots.  Only those who have a full period-of-time audit can propose ballots.  Or at least that is my read of the bylaws.
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Public mailing list
>> Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
> 
> -- 
> Regards 
>  
> Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
>  	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org/>
> XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
> Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org/>
> Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160119/2ffea1bd/attachment-0003.html>