[cabfpub] Code Signing Working Group

Dean Coclin Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Thu Apr 28 01:10:37 UTC 2016

I’d rather wait until after Bilbao.  4 weeks guys, c’mon.


From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com>
Cc: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Code Signing Working Group




On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com <mailto:pzb at amzn.com> > wrote:

How about a much simpler solution:

The CA/Browser Forum Code Signing Working Group (CABFCSWG) will cease meeting immediately and the topic will be removed from the bi-weekly conference agenda.

Anyone interested in discussing the Code Signing Baseline Requirements that Microsoft had decided to adopt can meet to discuss these independently, rather than under the auspices of the CA/Browser Forum.. If the CA/Browser Forum chair see so fit, he or she can invite one or more people who attend those meetings to join the bi-weekly CA/Browser Forum conference call, as long as those people have signed the IPR agreement.

I think that the current conference call line we frequently use for working group meetings belongs to a CABF member, so it would be up to that member if they want to allow the new group to use the line.

Would this resolve the concerns of Google and Mozilla?



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160427/300e5d59/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160427/300e5d59/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list