[cabfpub] Ballot 152 - Issuance of SHA-1 certificates through 2016

Dean Coclin Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Tue Oct 6 15:23:15 UTC 2015

Yes, Ryan is correct. Nonetheless, I am going to add it to the agenda for this week’s meeting.



From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 9:25 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley
Cc: Rick Andrews; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 152 - Issuance of SHA-1 certificates through 2016




On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com> wrote:

Also  - a point of order on this, but I thought all ballots needed one telephone call or face to face before they could be started?  Did that change?


That was never required by the bylaws. While a good idea to gauge as a bellwether for the likeliness of the ballot to succeed, any member may propose a ballot at any time, so long as requisite number of co-sponsors is found, adequate time is given for review and voting, and that review and voting is clearly indicated in the ballot.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151006/31151e19/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151006/31151e19/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list