[cabfpub] FW: Extension of period allowing .onion certificates

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Nov 23 16:44:28 UTC 2015

Agreed that I don't believe a ballot is necessary to extend or permit
anything. We could put forth a ballot to clear up the language, but that
would have no change on the functional issuance of such certificates, which
are permitted under the current BRs indefinitely now that status has been

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 22/11/15 21:08, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> > Is this sufficient reason to authorize .onion permanently?
> I didn't realise the authorization wasn't permanent; I thought it was
> permanent conditional on IESG approval, which we now have. If that's not
> the case, we should fix that, yes :-)
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151123/21b87efc/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list