[cabfpub] Ballot 143 - Formalization of Validation Working Group

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Feb 16 01:10:33 UTC 2015

In that case, Google votes YES.

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Rowley
<jeremy.rowley at digicert.com> wrote:
> Yes - that is the plan.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 5:50 PM
> To: Jeremy Rowley
> Cc: CABFPub
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 143 - Formalization of Validation Working Group
> Jeremy,
> To confirm, will this newly-formalized WG be operated consistent with Section 5.3 of our Bylaws? Specifically:
> "With the approval of the Chair, Working Groups may establish separate list-servs, wikis, and web pages for their communications, but all such separate list-servs must be managed in the same fashion as the Public Mail List."
> The existing EV WG does not operate according to the above, so I'm wanting to know how this newly formalized group will be handled if the motion succeeds.
> Cheers,

More information about the Public mailing list