[cabfpub] about EV period for Gov
Gervase Markham
gerv at mozilla.org
Wed Nov 19 15:54:19 UTC 2014
On 19/11/14 00:23, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> I’m not taking a position either way, but there are more possibilities
> if vetting cycles are not necessarily linked to maximum certificate
> lifespan.
That's an interesting idea.
Are CAs able to give some idea as to the relative weight behind various
possible reasons for resistance to a lower maximum limit for certificate
lifetime? Some reasons might be:
* Hassle and expense of doing the vetting again
* Inconvenience for the customer in having to change their cert
* (Other)
Gerv
More information about the Public
mailing list