[cabfpub] RFC 3647 Formatting of EV Guidelines and BaselineRequirements

[Ben Wilson]

Let me make another pass at the document and address your comments and then
we can talk about it in Mountain View.  OK?

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Rowley
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 AM
To: i-barreira at izenpe.net; ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] RFC 3647 Formatting of EV Guidelines and
BaselineRequirements

 

RFC 3647 is a recommended format for a CP.  The baseline requirements are a
CP.  Putting the BRs and EV Guidelines in the recommended format simplifies
the comparison between a CA’s practices and the industry requirements.  If
there are “holes”, it’s simply because we lack requirements in that area.
Reformatting the CP really shows where we are deficient in our requirements.
I agree with Kirk that we shouldn’t create requirements where there aren’t
problems, but some of these “hole” topics may be worth discussing further.

 

jeremy 

 

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of i-barreira at izenpe.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:23 AM
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] RFC 3647 Formatting of EV Guidelines and
BaselineRequirements

 

Ben,

 

I sent some comments on this RFC 3647 formatting and basically, don´t see
the need and there are many “holes” to cover. This RFC is for CAs saying
what we do and how, but the CABF doc is a recommendations/requirements on
CAs to make things, don´t see the parallelism.

 

 

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net

945067705

 

Descripción: cid:image001.png at 01CE3152.B4804EB0

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea.
Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki
idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna.
KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la
que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por
error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se
pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

 

De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En
nombre de Ben Wilson
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de febrero de 2014 20:49
Para: public at cabforum.org
Asunto: [cabfpub] RFC 3647 Formatting of EV Guidelines and
BaselineRequirements

 

In order to move another step closer on this before the Working Group
meeting, would there be any objection if I were to address comments we’ve
received thus far to the rough drafts and send out new redlined versions?
Otherwise, we might not have enough to review and discuss, and I don’t see
the need to wait until the face-to-face meeting.  If you do object, then
please send me a brief synopsis of what you intend to say during the RFC
3647 working session, and I will put you on the agenda so that you can
speak.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140211/9d952189/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140211/9d952189/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5453 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140211/9d952189/attachment-0001.p7s>