[cabfpub] Agenda Items for Next Call

tScheme Technical Manager richard.trevorah at tScheme.org
Wed Nov 20 11:09:24 UTC 2013


Hi Iñigo,

 

I think that this is a bit premature, there is still not an agreed draft for
the complete revised Regulation – let alone the scope and timescale for any
Implementing Acts.

 

When there is an agreed definition and audit process for providers of
Qualified  Certificates for Website Authentication, then that would be the
time for discussion as to how they need to be reflected in the CA/Browser
Forum’s processes.

 

Best regards

Richard

------------------------------------
Richard Trevorah
Technical Manager
tScheme Limited

M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311

http://www.tscheme.org
------------------------------------

The information in this message and, if present, any attachments are
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). The
content of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential and may be
legally privileged. Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is
unauthorised and may be unlawful.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any
attachments and notify the sender as soon as practicable

 

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of i-barreira at izenpe.net
Sent: 20 November 2013 10:09
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Agenda Items for Next Call

 

Hi Ben,

 

I´d like to update/modify the requirements for new applications, at least
for EU CAs and incorporate the evidence of being part of their country TSL
according to the new implementing act of the commission. I think it´s a
minor change and won´t affect the EU (or from some other countries)
applicants.

Should I propose a ballot? Do I need to send more info?

 

Regards

 

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net

945067705

 

Descripción: cid:image001.png at 01CE3152.B4804EB0

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea.
Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki
idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna.
KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la
que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por
error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se
pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

 

De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En
nombre de Ben Wilson
Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2013 0:22
Para: public at cabforum.org
Asunto: [cabfpub] Agenda Items for Next Call

 

Here are some potential discussion items for this Thursday’s call:

 

Discussion of Microsoft’s SHA1 Announcement, Certificate lifetimes, SHA2
support, etc.

Report on status of Ballot 89 (EV Processing)

Discuss Ballot 107 (Remove specific references)

Discuss Bylaw Revisions and potential ballot (11/18 email from Gerv) 

Membership applications

Report from Code Signing Working Group 

Review of Web Site

 

Please let me know if you have any to add.


Thanks,

 

Ben

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20131120/8692da83/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20131120/8692da83/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the Public mailing list