[cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

[Jeremy Rowley]

I’m not advocating removing proper authorization.  Its adequately covered under Section  11.7 and 11.8.  What I’m opposed to is requiring a verification of authority under Section 11.6. 

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:47 AM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

 


On 05/15/2013 02:57 AM, From Jeremy Rowley: 

Domain
name verification should really be completely separate from obligations
surrounding use of a certificate and verification of the certificate
request.


For years the exclusive right and proper authorization was part of the landscape of EV. If this proposal would be adopted we probably will abandon non-EV organization validated certificates and move them all over to EV (for the better or worse). But then we probably should remove the "Extended" from "Extended Validation" because it clearly wouldn't be that anymore. :-)




Regards 


 


Signer: 

Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO


 

StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> 


XMPP: 

startcom at startcom.org


Blog: 

Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> 


Twitter: 

Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg> 


 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130515/ae4679b2/attachment-0003.html>