[cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

[i-barreira at izenpe.net]

I agree with Eddy. What would mean then “extended”? Maybe a rewording of the “exclusive right to use” is enough but I wouldn´t go further than that, we have to be sure that it has the “control” or “the right to use” or whatever needed, but don´t remove that control

 

 

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net <mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.net> 

945067705

 

 

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

 

De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Enviado el: miércoles, 15 de mayo de 2013 9:47
Para: public at cabforum.org
Asunto: Re: [cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

 


On 05/15/2013 02:57 AM, From Jeremy Rowley: 

Domain
name verification should really be completely separate from obligations
surrounding use of a certificate and verification of the certificate
request.


For years the exclusive right and proper authorization was part of the landscape of EV. If this proposal would be adopted we probably will abandon non-EV organization validated certificates and move them all over to EV (for the better or worse). But then we probably should remove the "Extended" from "Extended Validation" because it clearly wouldn't be that anymore. :-)



Regards 

 

Signer: 

Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO

 

StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> 

XMPP: 

startcom at startcom.org

Blog: 

Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> 

Twitter: 

Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg> 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130515/1cb56250/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19121 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20130515/1cb56250/attachment-0003.png>