[cabfpub] Proposed motion to modify EV domain verification section

Yngve N. Pettersen yngve at spec-work.net
Fri May 3 05:37:49 MST 2013

On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:22:28 +0200, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)  
<eddy_nigg at startcom.org> wrote:

> On 05/02/2013 09:16 PM, From Rich Smith:
>> In the interest of simplifying the EV Guidelines and to allow
>> uniformity of processes where possible I propose the following
>> amendment to the EV Guidelines.  I'm looking for two endorsers.
> Do you really consider of these to be sufficient for EV?


Just a general thought: If there is overlap between domain verification  
procedures in the BR and EV, but not complete overlap, with the ones  
outside the overlap being insufficient for EV, perhaps the way forward  
would be to separate the procedures that are common for EV and BR out as a  
separate set of procedures? Then the ones that are not suitable for EV can  
be specified in a separate subsection.

This would of course require editing the BR, as well as the EV guidelines,  
and would likely require a synchronized version release. This would be  
more complex, but would accomplish what is being proposed, without  
reducing the EV security.

Yngve N. Pettersen

Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

More information about the Public mailing list