[cabfpub] CAB Forum Document Versioning

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Thu Jan 31 11:02:26 UTC 2013

On 29/01/13 21:34, Sheehy, Don (CA - Toronto) wrote:
> but if/when 2.3.2 is then released by cab ( say a month later), there
> will need to be clarity that 2.3.2 was not incorporated into audit
> due to timing [ the whole numbers produce better clarity in my
> opinion - easier for public to understand that WebTrust for EV 1.4 is
> based on 1.4 and not 1.4.1 as an example].

This point is a good one, insofar as we should make sure the first
release called 1.4 is referred to as "1.4.0" rather than "1.4", to avoid
confusion. Then the audit criteria could refer to "1.4.0" and everyone
would know it's not the same thing as e.g. "1.4.3".


More information about the Public mailing list