[cabfpub] Possible Language for Lightweight IPR Agreement
ben at digicert.com
Tue Apr 30 14:22:53 MST 2013
I could go back and create one specifically for individuals, but then we'll
have to see whether we can get consensus on the lighter-weight obligations.
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:43 AM
To: ben at digicert.com; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Possible Language for Lightweight IPR Agreement
I thought the idea of a lightweight agreement was that it would be lighter
weight than our current agreement, and focussed on the common case of an
individual who owns no patents. However, these seem to be "wrapper"
documents for the current policy, in that they incorporate it by reference.
This makes them heavyweight, rather than lightweight, and also leads to
questions about what it means for a person to agree to a policy whose
wording is focussed on organizations.
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
More information about the Public