[cabfpub] DigiCert proposal and Interested Party voting rights

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Sat Sep 8 07:11:42 UTC 2012

On 07/09/12 23:36, Hill, Brad wrote:
> I request that you would consider, during the modification phase we are
> currently in, changing this to require no more than parity with the
> number of active Application Vendors at the time of any vote.
> (historically around 4 to 5)

That seems like a fine idea.


More information about the Public mailing list