[cabfpub] RFC6125 and Subject Alternative Name Ballot request.
Hill, Brad
bhill at paypal-inc.com
Wed Oct 17 08:31:46 MST 2012
Actually, that's what the current, approved text of the BR 1.0 already says. I didn't change anything in that part of the text.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org]
> On Behalf Of Adam Langley
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:24 AM
> To: Steve Roylance
> Cc: CABFPub; CABForum Management
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] RFC6125 and Subject Alternative Name Ballot request.
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Steve Roylance
> <steve.roylance at globalsign.com> wrote:
> > I've attached an updated v1.1 so people can see where it all fits in
> > and the text itself as a separate file. Word and PDF versions.
>
> "Each subjectAltName entry MUST be a Domain Name or IP Address"
>
> Really? We want to ban all other types of certificates? The Baseline states
> that its scope is "authenticating servers accessible through the Internet" but
> Jabber already specifies the use of SRVNames (RFC 6125).
>
> (I know that Baseline goes on to say that "IM" is not in scope, but either that
> meant some form of personal IM certificate, or it's contradicting itself.)
>
>
> Cheers
>
> AGL
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
More information about the Public
mailing list