[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot 92 - Subject Alternative Names

[Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)]

On 11/16/2012 07:42 PM, From Jeremy Rowley:
>
> I would say the intent is to ensure that there is a legitimate party 
> behind each certificate and reduce the risks associated with what we 
> consider a high risk practice (as shown in the example I previously 
> provided).  OV is not required if the owner of the domain names listed 
> in the certificate is the same.
>

I've just come across your reply here and probably the last sentence 
doesn't make any sense.

If the owner of the domain names is listed in the certificate, it's 
probably and IV or OV certificate. So it's there already... :S


Regards
Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121117/3020fb55/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4540 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121117/3020fb55/attachment-0002.p7s>