[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot [94] - Adoption of CA/Browser Forum Bylaws
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Thu Nov 15 22:13:38 UTC 2012
On 11/16/2012 12:03 AM, From Rich Smith:
>
> */[RWS] But if it doesn't have any detrimental effect to relying
> parties and is beneficial to CAs and/or their customers, then I would
> definitely not call that unnecessary. Going back to ballot 88 we had
> placed restrictions that had real consequences for a subscriber with a
> very legitimate use case. I don't consider the changes made by that
> ballot unnecessary at all. And I think the government of a widely
> recognized independent country whose problem we solved would agree./*
>
Sure, but why shouldn't a least one software vendor think that too?
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121116/116581a6/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4540 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20121116/116581a6/attachment-0002.p7s>
More information about the Public
mailing list