[cabfpub] ISO 3166-1 country codes

[Moudrick M. Dadashov]

Ok, I see. Another option e.g. what if the Guidelines allow omitted C= for Subjects whose CN explicitly shows its territory?  Everybody knows what Kosovo means. I'm not sure if that would help with your recent customer however.

Thanks,
M.D.

Rich Smith <richard.smith at comodo.com> wrote:

>Given that my customer is a ministry of the government of Kosovo, I don't
>really think that going to fly with them, and it doesn't really fly with me
>in terms of maintaining conformance to the laws of the two countries (UK and
>US) to which Comodo CA is subject.
>
> 
>
>As I said, and I'm not trying to be difficult, but the real world fact, from
>my perspective, and that of my customer and the laws to which we are both
>subject, is that the Republic of Kosovo legally exists as a sovereign
>country.  I have an organization which is validated to an EV standard.  I'm
>going to solve the problem one way or the other, but my preference is for it
>to be done at the Forum level so that there is an official standard in our
>industry and relying parties can thereby identify it properly and
>consistently.  As I see it, the way to do that is follow the European
>Commission's lead and use XK until such time as there is an official 3166
>code and publish that as a CA/B Forum standard so that relying parties can
>clearly identify it across all CAs.  If a CA is subject to a jurisdiction
>where their real world fact is that there is no country called the Republic
>of Kosovo, they are free to use the code for Serbia (my guess is they won't
>get much business from organizations based in Kosovo, but that's neither
>here nor there).
>
> 
>
>As previously stated, I'm open to edits of my suggested wording, and I'm
>open to alternate solutions that solve the problem, BUT saying pretend the
>Republic of Kosovo doesn't exist until there's an official ISO 3166 code for
>it is NOT a solution.  ISO doesn't create the country.
>
> 
>
>-Rich
>
> 
>
>From: Moudrick M. Dadashov [mailto:md at ssc.lt] 
>Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:34 PM
>To: richard.smith at comodo.com
>Cc: 'Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)'; public at cabforum.org
>Subject: Re: [cabfpub] ISO 3166-1 country codes
>
> 
>
>Rich, what if you put Serbia as C= and add a region attribute for Kosovo,
>will that work?
>
>Thanks,
>M.D. 
>
>On 7/31/2012 10:03 PM, Rich Smith wrote:
>
> 
>
> 
>
>From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
>Behalf Of Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
>Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:15 PM
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>Hi Rich,
>
>On 07/30/2012 11:39 PM, From Rich Smith: 
>
>Since XK is set aside by the ISO as user assigned, I tend to lean toward
>allowing it, but I also think that we should probably decide as a group so
>that we all (at least all in jurisdictions which recognize Kosovo) treat
>Kosovo in a uniform fashion.  Thoughts?
>
>
>I'm not in favor because this code doesn't say really anything to a relying
>party (could be as well XX). A code that hasn't been approved shall not be
>used because it's not possible to recognize it.
>
>
>
>
>[RWS] OK, I do recognize that XK being unofficial does make it problematic,
>and that's why I wanted to get a standard set at the CA/B Forum level, so it
>IS identifiable across the industry.  I have submitted a draft motion which
>addresses the situation in the same way that the organization to which the
>UN passed responsibility for the region has addressed it, and it will allow
>a CA to issue a certificate in accordance with the laws of the respective
>jurisdictions to which the CA and it's customer are subject.  The motion
>clarifies this situation in the BRs and takes into account both those
>jurisdictions which DO and DO NOT recognize the sovereignty of the Republic
>of Kosovo.  I am absolutely open to constructive edits of that motion for
>clarity.  I'm also open to better suggestions if anyone has one, but I do
>want to get this resolved quickly as I have a customer, verified to EV
>standards, waiting in the wings for a decision.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Public mailing list
>Public at cabforum.org
>http://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20120801/d61399ed/attachment-0003.html>