[cabfcert_policy] Wrong references in BRs

Mads Egil Henriksveen Mads.Henriksveen at buypass.no
Thu Feb 16 23:17:54 MST 2017


Hi Dimitris

I can confirm this – see also attachment.

Regards
Mads

From: Policyreview [mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos
Sent: 15. februar 2017 14:43
To: policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] Wrong references in BRs


While reviewing Ballot 188 and the red-lined document against BRs 1.4.2, I noticed some problematic references.

In Section 3.2.2.4, third paragraph, it references "Section 3.3.1 of this document". However, Section 3.3.1 is empty. It probably should be Section 4.2.1 which state the 39 month re-use of validation information.

This is brought again in 3.2.2.4.6 " (such as in Section 3.3.1 of these Guidelines or Section 11.14.3 of the EV Guidelines)". Again, I think it should refer to Section 4.2.1. Can someone please confirm this? We could apply this correction in any upcoming ballots that affect the BRs.


Best regards,
Dimitris.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20170217/f30259ea/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mads Egil Henriksveen <Mads.Henriksveen at buypass.no>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 169 problem report
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:13:03 +0000
Size: 74768
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20170217/f30259ea/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the Policyreview mailing list