[cabfcert_policy] CA vs. CAO
Dimitris Zacharopoulos
jimmy at it.auth.gr
Mon Nov 21 14:11:03 MST 2016
First of all, sorry I missed the last call. This topic was discussed in
previous F2F meetings and on several occasions. I believe that nobody
wants to go over changing every document that has the term "CA" and
change it to "CAO". If we are to do such a big change, I would vote to
use the term "Trust Service Provider - TSP" in order to align with the
European model.
The majority of the CAs and auditors have linked the term "CA" with an
"organization". That's why it was agreed (on past meetings) that we will
not try to change the meaning of the term "CA" to mean anything else but
that of an organization. Instead, we would try to use this term
consistently (to refer to an organization) and introduce changes to the
other instances to mean something else. That would introduce fewer
changes in the BRs and EV guidelines.
Dimitris.
On 21/11/2016 10:47 μμ, Ben Wilson wrote:
>
> On our most recent call, Peter Bowen and I again discussed use of “CA”
> vs. something else. (Back on May 5^th I sent out a proposed “straw
> poll” to this group, but I don’t think I ever sent it to the public
> list.) Peter and I like the term “CA Operator” or abbreviated, “CAO”.
> The only downside, which is a big one – I’ll admit, is that the term
> “CA” seems to be used pervasively within the Forum and elsewhere to
> refer to the entity that operates a CA.
>
> Following our last call, I started to do a replacement of CA with CAO
> to see how it would look/work, but I stopped because there would be
> many instances to replace and I wanted to get more of a consensus
> from this group and potentially the public list.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policyreview mailing list
> Policyreview at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/policyreview
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20161121/48ec34fa/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Policyreview
mailing list