[cabf_netsec] Audit Records and Archival Ballot Endorsers

Clint Wilson clintw at apple.com
Thu Dec 9 16:33:48 UTC 2021

Hi team,

I’m working on (hopefully) buttoning up Ballot SC51 and wanted to finalize/confirm a second endorser for this ballot.
The full description is available here: https://wiki.cabforum.org/scwg/sc51-reduce-clarify-audit-log-and-records-archival-retention <https://wiki.cabforum.org/scwg/sc51-reduce-clarify-audit-log-and-records-archival-retention> and the redline is here: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cda0f92ee70121fd5d692685b97ebb6669c74fb7...63dc6210e728349bb4602e4ede051efed593a91c <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cda0f92ee70121fd5d692685b97ebb6669c74fb7...63dc6210e728349bb4602e4ede051efed593a91c>.
As a brief reminder, this is a spiritual successor of SC38, which encountered some challenges in discussion due to unforeseen interactions with e.g. 4.1.1. With SC50 passed, and other changes made in the draft text of SC51, we believe we’ve addressed and built further upon the original goals of SC38, allowing us to reduce the retention period of archives, while also further clarifying surrounding requirements for CAs.

Is anyone here willing/able to endorse these changes?

Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/netsec/attachments/20211209/e426418f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3621 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/netsec/attachments/20211209/e426418f/attachment.p7s>

More information about the Netsec mailing list