[Infrastructure] Ballots Page Udpated

[Ben Wilson]

I'll take a look at those ballot numbers and see if there is a way to
create some record of those in WordPress.
Thanks,
Ben

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:33 AM Kati Davids <kati at godaddy.com> wrote:

> Is it possible to get missing ballots added with a note next to them if
> they were not passed? For someone not looped into the communication of the
> history of all the ballots, it can be hard to tell if the ballots are
> missing on accident, or if they are missing for a valid reason (having
> failed, having not been voted on yet, etc)
>
>
>
> Examples: SC-043, SC-040, SC-038, SC-034, SC-032, SC-020, SC-011, SC-008,
> SC-005
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Kati Davids*
>
> GoDaddy | Technology Risk Management
>
> [image: https://email-sig.gd-resources.net/img/godaddy-logo-outline.png]
>
> United States
>
> kati at godaddy.com | #tech_risk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Infrastructure <infrastructure-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf
> Of *Doody, Malcolm F via Infrastructure
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2021 1:19 AM
> *To:* Ben Wilson <bwilson at mozilla.com>
> *Cc:* infrastructure at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Infrastructure] Ballots Page Udpated
>
>
>
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad at .
>
>
>
> Ben,
>
>
>
> Ballot SC27 doesn’t appear to follow the same 3-digit zero-padded
> convention of the others, so also sorts out-of-order. ie SC-27, not SC-027
>
>
>
> There are two entries for Ballot 89, one as 089, the other as 89. They
> look to be two iterations of the same ballot, but the status is shown as
> blank for both, implying that both passed – though the title of the 089
> entry sort-of implies that the other did not pass…
>
>
>
> //M
>
>
>
> *From:* Ben Wilson <bwilson at mozilla.com>
> *Sent:* 18 August 2021 20:56
> *To:* Doody, Malcolm F <malcolm.doody at cgi.com>
> *Cc:* infrastructure at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Infrastructure] Ballots Page Udpated
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:03 PM Doody, Malcolm F <malcolm.doody at cgi.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
>
>
> It looks as if Ballot SC16 is missing the ballot# metadata, as it’s
> showing at the top of the list if you sort by the Ballot column.
>
>
>
> //M
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20210819/5c06a628/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6648 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20210819/5c06a628/attachment-0001.png>