[cabf_governance] Proposed Bylaws Revision

[Virginia Fournier]

I’m sorry I was not able to attend the meeting today, as I was on a plane.

Apple objects to this approach.  We need to review the proposed changes and understand why they need to be made.  It’s not clear why this is coming up now, and why the changes are necessary.

Also, would you please send me the redline directly?  The attachments always get stripped off of the list emails.  Thanks.

Best regards,

Virginia Fournier
Senior Standards Counsel
 Apple Inc.
☏ 669-227-9595
✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>



On Sep 4, 2018, at 11:37 PM, Ben Wilson via Govreform <govreform at cabforum.org> wrote:

Hi All,
On today’s Governance Reform WG call we decided that the best approach would be to do as Kirk suggested and just re-adopt the entire Bylaws with the changes that needed to be made.  Even though the attached redlining may not be based off the “official” version, it does baseline off of the version 1.9 that is on the website.   DigiCert will be proposing adoption of this by Forum ballot.  I think Jos from Cisco agreed to endorse.  We would need one more endorser to move forward with this.
Thanks,
Ben
<CABF-Bylaws-v.2.0-redline-for-ballot.docx><CABF-Bylaws-v.2.0-redline-for-ballot.pdf>_______________________________________________
Govreform mailing list
Govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:Govreform at cabforum.org>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20180905/2e2b7e03/attachment-0001.html>