[cabf_governance] Ballot 206 and documents
Virginia Fournier
vfournier at apple.com
Tue Feb 6 09:25:12 MST 2018
Hi Dimitris,
Would you please let us know what changes you’d propose to resolve the issues you’ve mentioned below? Your changes weren’t left out intentionally - we probably just missed your request. Thanks.
Virginia Fournier
Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse iTypos
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 12:14 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I reviewed the diffs and the proposed alignment between WebTrust and ETSI is not included in the proposed Bylaws draft (2.1a). I sent a proposal on Jan 9th (https://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/2018-January/000355.html) about the Server Certificate Working Group Charter but the concept is the same for the Bylaws.
>
> If we include the requirement for "WebTrust for CAs" audit, then the equivalent ETSI audit should be "ETSI EN 319 401". This probably fits best for the Bylaws.
> If we include the requirement for "WebTrust for CAs + WebTrust Baseline + NetSec " audit, then the equivalent ETSI audit should be "ETSI EN 319 411-1". This probably fits best for the Server Certificate Working Group Charter.
> The old ETSI TS standards should not be included in the new bylaws.
>
> I was also puzzled with the following requirement in the Bylaws (section 2.1a) "such certificates being treated as valid by a Certificate Consumer Member". So, if a CA issues Certificates for Digital Signatures which are trusted by Adobe and Adobe is not a Member of the Forum, then this CA doesn't meet the requirements. Is this a correct interpretation?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dimitris.
>
>
>> On 6/2/2018 9:15 πμ, Virginia Fournier via Govreform wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My apologies, I have a conflict for tomorrow’s meeting and will not be able to attend. I am sending what I hope are virtually final versions of the documents. I am sending diff files for the Bylaws and IPR policy, as the Word compare function will not cooperate. The diffs may be easier to read in the end anyway.
>>
>> As you may have seen from my email earlier today, we have to cut off any new issues, content, etc. from being added to the ballot so we can finalize it. From this point forward, we need to just review what we have, clean up typos or any errors in the ballot, and move it forward. With this in mind, I’d appreciate it if you’d review the documents attached/referenced below to see if there are any corrections/adjustments that need to be made. We can keep a list of additional issues that should be addressed for the next ballot.
>>
>> What is the status of the Server Certificate WG charter? I sent some comments to Dean/Ben - have you had a chance to look at those? We need the final version of that document also to complete the package.
>>
>> I’d like to send the documents out early next week and start an “informal” discussion period of 7 days next for any questions people may have. Does anyone see any obstacles to doing that?
>>
>> Here’s the diff for the Bylaws (all changes since version 1.7 shown).
>>
>> https://draftable.com/compare/JHYFfXWaHGRx
>>
>> Here’s the diff for the IPR Policy (all changes since version 1.2 shown:
>>
>> https://draftable.com/compare/QuHvYZiCAAUr
>>
>> =
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Virginia Fournier
>> Senior Standards Counsel
>> Apple Inc.
>> ☏ 669-227-9595
>> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Virginia Fournier via Govreform <govreform at cabforum.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Here are the final documents for Ballot 206. Please confirm that you’re ready to go forward with them in January after the holidays. Please also let me know if you can open the Bylaws diff file. What is the status of the Server Certificate WG’s charter? Thanks for everyone’s hard work on this project.
>>
>> <CABF_Ballot206_20DEC17.docx>
>> <CABF-IPR-Policy-v.1.3_20DEC17_clean.doc>
>> <CABF-IPR-Policy-v.1.3_20DEC17_redline.doc>
>> <CABF-Bylaws-v.1.8_20DEC17_clean.doc>
>> <CABF-Governance Change FAQ_20DEC17.docx>
>> <Bylaws DiffNow Comparison Report.htm>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Virginia Fournier
>> Senior Standards Counsel
>> Apple Inc.
>> ☏ 669-227-9595
>> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Govreform mailing list
>> Govreform at cabforum.org
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform
>>
>> =
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Govreform mailing list
>> Govreform at cabforum.org
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20180206/1a985c85/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Govreform
mailing list