[cabf_governance] Ballot 206 and documents

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos]

Hello all,

I reviewed the diffs and the proposed alignment between WebTrust and 
ETSI is not included in the proposed Bylaws draft (2.1a). I sent a 
proposal on Jan 9th 
(https://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/2018-January/000355.html) 
about the Server Certificate Working Group Charter but the concept is 
the same for the Bylaws.

  * If we include the requirement for "WebTrust for CAs" audit, then the
    equivalent ETSI audit should be "*ETSI EN 319 401*". This probably
    fits best for the Bylaws.
  * If we include the requirement for "WebTrust for CAs + WebTrust
    Baseline + NetSec " audit, then the equivalent ETSI audit should be
    "ETSI EN 319 411-1". This probably fits best for the Server
    Certificate Working Group Charter.

The old ETSI TS standards should not be included in the new bylaws.

I was also puzzled with the following requirement in the Bylaws (section 
2.1a) "such certificates being treated as valid by a Certificate 
Consumer*Member*". So, if a CA issues Certificates for Digital 
Signatures which are trusted by Adobe and Adobe is not a Member of the 
Forum, then this CA doesn't meet the requirements. Is this a correct 
interpretation?


Best regards,
Dimitris.


On 6/2/2018 9:15 πμ, Virginia Fournier via Govreform wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My apologies, I have a conflict for tomorrow’s meeting and will not be 
> able to attend.  I am sending what I hope are virtually final versions 
> of the documents.  I am sending diff files for the Bylaws and IPR 
> policy, as the Word compare function will not cooperate. The diffs may 
> be easier to read in the end anyway.
>
> As you may have seen from my email earlier today, we have to cut off 
> any new issues, content, etc. from being added to the ballot so we can 
> finalize it.  From this point forward, we need to just review what we 
> have, clean up typos or any errors in the ballot, and move it forward. 
>  With this in mind, I’d appreciate it if you’d review the documents 
> attached/referenced below to see if there are any 
> corrections/adjustments that need to be made.  We can keep a list of 
> additional issues that should be addressed for the next ballot.
>
> What is the status of the Server Certificate WG charter?  I sent some 
> comments to Dean/Ben - have you had a chance to look at those?  We 
> need the final version of that document also to complete the package.
>
> I’d like to send the documents out early next week and start an 
> “informal” discussion period of 7 days next for any questions people 
> may have.  Does anyone see any obstacles to doing that?
>
> Here’s the diff for the Bylaws (all changes since version 1.7 shown).
>
> https://draftable.com/compare/JHYFfXWaHGRx
>
> Here’s the diff for the IPR Policy (all changes since version 1.2 shown:
>
> https://draftable.com/compare/QuHvYZiCAAUr
>
> =
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Virginia Fournier
> Senior Standards Counsel
>  Apple Inc.
> ☏ 669-227-9595
> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Virginia Fournier via Govreform 
> <govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Here are the final documents for Ballot 206.  Please confirm that 
> you’re ready to go forward with them in January after the holidays. 
>  Please also let me know if you can open the Bylaws diff file.  What 
> is the status of the Server Certificate WG’s charter?  Thanks for 
> everyone’s hard work on this project.
>
> <CABF_Ballot206_20DEC17.docx>
> <CABF-IPR-Policy-v.1.3_20DEC17_clean.doc>
> <CABF-IPR-Policy-v.1.3_20DEC17_redline.doc>
> <CABF-Bylaws-v.1.8_20DEC17_clean.doc>
> <CABF-Governance Change FAQ_20DEC17.docx>
> <Bylaws DiffNow Comparison Report.htm>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Virginia Fournier
> Senior Standards Counsel
>  Apple Inc.
> ☏ 669-227-9595
> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Govreform mailing list
> Govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:Govreform at cabforum.org>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform
>
> =
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Govreform mailing list
> Govreform at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20180206/051c71b1/attachment-0001.html>