[cabf_governance] [EXTERNAL]Re: Notes from Today's Call

[Virginia Fournier]

Hi all,

Thanks to Peter, Gerv and Kirk for affirming that the patient still has a pulse.  Onward we go!

What are the next steps?  Do we have the “Web Server” WG charter to review?


Best regards,

Virginia Fournier
Senior Standards Counsel
 Apple Inc.
☏ 669-227-9595
✉︎ vmf at apple.com






On Oct 11, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com> wrote:

At the recent F2F meeting, I raised Virginia's point - that interest in the governance change proposals and participation in the Governance Change Working Group had waned over time - and asked the attendees if there was still interest in proceeding.  I pointed out that the easy alternative was for new non-SSL certificate groups (what we are trying to provide for in this Governance Change Working Group's output) could also be created independently by the new groups, without having to go through the Forum.

It appeared to me that the attendees were in favor of continuing in the current direction set by the Working Group, and even hoped we could finish this up in the near future.  So Virginia - I do think there is interest in proceeding, and the small number of WG participants probably just represents strong confidence in the WG members' ability to complete this project very competently!

-----Original Message-----
From: Govreform [mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Govreform
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:30 AM
To: Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com>; Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Governance WG List <govreform at cabforum.org>
Cc: Virginia Fournier <vmf at apple.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabf_governance] Notes from Today's Call

On 11/10/17 05:45, Peter Bowen wrote:
> I was under the impression we were very close to finalizing the work 
> of this group.  I circulated the last draft to my counsel colleagues 
> and submitted comments to this group.  I thought there were only a 
> couple open issues remaining and then this would proceed to ballot.
> 
> I very much appreciate all the time you have spent with this group and 
> hope you do not feel it to be time wasted.

I am in agreement with everything Peter says here. I hope you do not feel that my comments, intended to be constructive, were "pushback".

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Govreform mailing list
Govreform at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform