[cabf_governance] draft Charter template for new WGs

[Virginia Fournier]

Probably in the Bylaws, because it would apply to all working groups.


Best regards,

Virginia Fournier
Senior Standards Counsel
 Apple Inc.
☏ 669-227-9595
✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>






On Feb 2, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr> wrote:


Correct, I also read that report and was wondering where would be the best place to address it. Do you plan on addressing this issue in the Bylaws or in the WG charter? I think the WG charter is the first in the chain that includes details about voting.


Best regards,
Dimitris.


On 2/2/2017 8:56 μμ, Virginia Fournier wrote:
> Hi Dimitris,
> 
> Agreed.  The implementation of the new WG structure will necessitate some changes to the Bylaws.  The issue you mention below is a change that we’ve identified, and is mentioned in the summary that the Governance WG sent out a week or so ago.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Virginia Fournier
> Senior Standards Counsel
>  Apple Inc.
> ☏ 669-227-9595
> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Govreform <govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:govreform at cabforum.org>> wrote:
> 
> Re-sending...
> 
> On 1/2/2017 11:26 μμ, Dean Coclin via Govreform wrote:
>> Here is the revised charter document as discussed on yesterday’s call.  We had a lighter crowd than usual so please provide your comments on the attached.
>>  
>> I don’t think this needs to be circulated to the larger forum at this time as we have received no comments on the substantive document and this is just a procedural template. I think we should circulate this once we have draft bylaws.
>>  
>> Dean
> 
> I know we have discussed this in the larger forum but since the charter document describes voting procedures, perhaps in the "Voting Structure for WG: (e.g., 2/3 of CAs, ½ of Browsers)" we could add a note that members participating in this WG, which are eligible for more than one member categories, MUST represent only one category for voting purposes.
> 
> Dimitris.
> 
>>  
>> From: Govreform [mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org>] On Behalf Of Virginia Fournier via Govreform
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 9:10 PM
>> To: CA/Browser Forum Governance WG List <Govreform at cabforum.org> <mailto:Govreform at cabforum.org>
>> Cc: Virginia Fournier <vfournier at apple.com> <mailto:vfournier at apple.com>
>> Subject: [cabf_governance] draft Charter template for new WGs
>>  
>> Hello all, 
>>  
>> Attached is the draft charter template to be used when new WGs are set up.  Please let me know your questions, comments, and concerns.
>>  
>> Thanks very much to Andrew Whalley for his helpful comments.
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>> Virginia Fournier
>> Senior Standards Counsel
>>  Apple Inc.
>> ☏ 669-227-9595
>> ✉︎ vmf at apple.com <mailto:vmf at apple.com>
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Govreform mailing list
>> Govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:Govreform at cabforum.org>
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform>
> _______________________________________________
> Govreform mailing list
> Govreform at cabforum.org <mailto:Govreform at cabforum.org>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/govreform>
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/govreform/attachments/20170202/e205f200/attachment-0001.html>