[cabf_governance] Project Life Cycle
Kirk.Hall at entrust.com
Tue May 10 12:35:16 MST 2016
Peter, I don't think we have every followed the Project Life Cycle - so maybe we should eliminate it.
From: govreform-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:govreform-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Peter Bowen
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Govreform at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabf_governance] Project Life Cycle
I would like to add one item the discussion on governance reform. Ballot 66 was passed several years ago and defined a Project Life Cycle. (https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/ProjectLifecycle)
It seems to define a parallel process to the formal Working Group process — instead of a formal ballot create the working group, there is a ballot to adopt a document provided by an informal working group. In both cases there is a ratification vote to make the document a Final Guideline.
I think it would make sense to consider how to reconcile the two seemingly separate processes.
Govreform mailing list
Govreform at cabforum.org
More information about the Govreform