[Cscwg-public] EV requirements simplification effort

[Ian McMillan]

Hi Tim,

Please include myself in this effort.

Thanks,
Ian
________________________________
From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Cscwg-public <cscwg-public at cabforum.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2024 5:48 AM
To: cscwg-public at cabforum.org <cscwg-public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Cscwg-public] EV requirements simplification effort




Hello,



At the Bergamo F2F code signing discussion, I proposed an effort to go through the EV requirements, and determine which of the requirements are useful for code signing in the modern world.



As the next step, it was proposed that a group of CAs would get together, go through the requirements, and come up with a proposal for a new version of EV that:



  1.  Keeps the strength of EV against relevant attacks, but
  2.  eliminates unnecessary requirements that do not provide security value.



If you would like to be part of the effort, please respond to this email.



-Tim


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20240530/6c8c9a32/attachment.html>