[Cscwg-public] EV requirements simplification effort

[Tim Hollebeek]

Hello,

 

At the Bergamo F2F code signing discussion, I proposed an effort to go
through the EV requirements, and determine which of the requirements are
useful for code signing in the modern world.

 

As the next step, it was proposed that a group of CAs would get together, go
through the requirements, and come up with a proposal for a new version of
EV that:

 

1.	Keeps the strength of EV against relevant attacks, but
2.	eliminates unnecessary requirements that do not provide security
value.

 

If you would like to be part of the effort, please respond to this email.

 

-Tim

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20240530/36fd4dcb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5231 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20240530/36fd4dcb/attachment.p7s>