[cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?

Tue Feb 2 12:23:19 UTC 2016

I think it will be 162 unless Ben has reserved that for one of the Policy
ballots.

Ben?

Thanks
Dean

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Bowen
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 7:15 AM
To: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?

I think more than enough full members have agreed to propose and endorse:

Richard Barnes of Mozilla

Eddy Nigg of StartCom

Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert

Adriano Santoni of Actalis

Ryan Sleevi of Google

Can whoever doles out ballot numbers please assign a number and can the
review period please be initiated?

Thanks,

Peter

On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:27 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com
<mailto:pzb at amzn.com> > wrote:

How about this?

Ballot XXX - Sunset of exceptions

The following motion has been proposed by ______________ of _________ and
endorsed by __________ of _________ and _________ of _________.

-----BEGIN MOTION-----

1) Modify section 6.1.7 of the Baseline Requirements to add items 5(f) and
5(g) which read:

f. The CA signs the Subscriber Certificate on or before June 30, 2016 

g. The notBefore field in the Subscriber Certificate has a date on or before
June 30, 2016

2) Modify section 6.3.2 of the Baseline Requirements to replace the words
"Beyond 1 April 2015" with the words "Until 30 June 2016"

-----END MOTION-----

On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Eddy Nigg <eddy_nigg at startcom.org
<mailto:eddy_nigg at startcom.org> > wrote:

Dito.

On 01/20/2016 01:25 AM, Jeremy Rowley wrote:

I'm happy to make the motion or endorse removal of these exceptions. 

From:  <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> public-bounces at cabforum.org [
<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Bowen
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:09 PM
To: Ryan Sleevi
Cc: CABFPub
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?

On Jan 19, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ryan Sleevi < <mailto:sleevi at google.com>
sleevi at google.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Peter Bowen < <mailto:pzb at amzn.com>
pzb at amzn.com> wrote:

The BRs contain at least two allowances for "legacy" certificate issuance:

6.1.7 (5) allows direct issuance of subscriber certificates from a root CA

6.3.2 allows certificates with validity periods longer than 39 months

Are these still needed?  Are CAs relying upon these exceptions?  If not,
does it make sense to ballot to remove these from the BRs?

Peter, I'd be happy to support a ballot if you want to propose one. That
tends to be the only way to get timely responses - the discussion period of
the ballot. 

As an Associate Member, I cannot propose ballots.  Only those who have a
full period-of-time audit can propose ballots.  Or at least that is my read
of the bylaws.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
 <mailto:Public at cabforum.org> Public at cabforum.org
 <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-- 

Regards 

Signer: 

Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO

 <http://www.startcom.org/> StartCom Ltd.

XMPP: 

 <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org> startcom at startcom.org

Blog: 

 <http://blog.startcom.org/> Join the Revolution!

Twitter: 

 <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg> Follow Me

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
 <mailto:Public at cabforum.org> Public at cabforum.org
 <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org> 
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160202/fdb9ab0e/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160202/fdb9ab0e/attachment-0001.p7s>