[cabf_validation] Registration and Incorporating Agencies Disclosure Formatting

[Joanna Fox]

Hi Corey,

Thanks for the quick response.  What I’m attempting to communicate is questioning when there is one incorporation/registration agency that contains data from multiple localities.  We have found a few examples of this throughout the years in various countries and I want to ensure we are communicating our findings appropriately in our disclosure.

Thanks,
Joanna

From: Corey Bonnell <CBonnell at securetrust.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:55 PM
To: Joanna Fox <jweber at godaddy.com>; CA/Browser Forum Validation SC List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: RE: [cabf_validation] Registration and Incorporating Agencies Disclosure Formatting

Hi Joanna,
From SC30:

Ø  The accepted value or values for each of the `subject:jurisdictionLocalityName` (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.1), `subject:jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName` (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.2), and `subject:jursidictionCountryName` (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.3) fields


Since it appears that source is for incorporation/registration at the state level, there would be nothing listed under locality in your table since the jurisL field in EV certificates should not be populated.

Thanks,
Corey

From: Validation <validation-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org>> On Behalf Of Joanna Fox via Validation
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:30 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org<mailto:validation at cabforum.org>>
Subject: [cabf_validation] Registration and Incorporating Agencies Disclosure Formatting

Hello all,

As we are close to completion for this project, I want to ensure that the intent of our Jurisdiction disclosure is understood. In the case where a specific source has multiple possible Jurisdiction options at the locality level, there are a few options for displaying the information. One option is placing those values in one field, comma separated, as displayed below.  Another option is to separate line by line for each differing locality.  This alternate option makes for a substantially longer list but more clearly communicates C/S/L.  Any thoughts or comments are appreciate.

Country
Name of source
Website
Jurisdiction (Country)
Jurisdiction (State or Province)
Jurisdiction (Locality)
Colombia
Cámara de Comercio del Amazonas
http://www.ccamazonas.org.co/actual/<http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=yMfj31PDDJe1LZyd7Nkh66ceHu4wO906B7v8-KVj4g&s=5&u=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2eccamazonas%2eorg%2eco%2factual%2f>
CO
Amazonas
El Encanto, La Chorrera, La Pedrera, La Victoria, Leticia, Mirití-Paraná, Puerto Alegría, Puerto Arica, Puerto Nariño, Puerto Santander, Tarapacá


Thank you,


Joanna Fox
GoDaddy | Sr. Manager Compliance
[https://email-sig.gd-resources.net/img/godaddy-logo-outline.png]
+1.602.817.7258 (-7 GMT)
jfox at godaddy.com<mailto:jfox at godaddy.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20200917/b6f1a4cc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6498 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20200917/b6f1a4cc/attachment-0001.png>