[cabf_validation] [EXTERNAL]Re: Including LEIs as extensions in EV certificates

[Doug Beattie]

Yea, that’s what I thought, but your last email [1] seemed to imply the opposite.

 

[1] https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/2019-September/001336.html 

 

Thanks for the clarification.

 

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 12:42 PM
To: Doug Beattie <doug.beattie at globalsign.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] [EXTERNAL]Re: Including LEIs as extensions in EV certificates

 

No. That is about as close to the opposite as one can get, sadly, so sorry for the confusion. :)

 

Wayne's message, at https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/2019-September/001332.html , accurately summarizes the expectations and concerns being expressed here. The remainder of the messages provided more technical details about the implementation choice of PSD2, which Kirk referenced but misunderstood.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190924/917d4f26/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190924/917d4f26/attachment.p7s>