[cabf_validation] [EXTERNAL]Re: Including LEIs as extensions in EV certificates

[Wayne Thayer]

I'm running on not much sleep, so it's quite possible that I am [extra]
confused, however I was literally referring to Tim's ballot proposal:

https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/master...timfromdigicert:Ballot-LEI?expand=1

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:29 PM Ryan Sleevi via Validation <
validation at cabforum.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:16 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>
>> With the PSD2 ballot, to support the existing profile for ETSI ESI, since
>> ETSI ESI made it clear they'd be unable to correct the technical issues in
>> a timely fashion, we allowed a temporary exception to include the VAT and
>> national registry numbers in the Subject:organizationIdentifier. This
>> information, however, must also be present in a certificate extension that
>> is specific to PSD2 at present, as specified in SC16.
>>
>
> Sorry, that first ballot was SC17 (allowing in organizationIdentifier, but
> eventually migrating to the extension), while prohibiting other attributes
> was SC16.
>
>> _______________________________________________
> Validation mailing list
> Validation at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190924/6d531a6d/attachment.html>