[cabf_validation] Simpler language for 3.2.2.4.6

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)]

Trying to "revive" this, if there is room for discussion in any of the 
upcoming validation Subcommittee calls.

The thread captured some ideas for improving the language and making it 
a little clearer in respect to the use of the term "meta tag".


Thanks,
Dimitris.

On 16/5/2018 4:23 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek wrote:
>
> Good feedback.  Yes.
>
> -Tim
>
> *From:*Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Validation
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 13, 2018 1:03 AM
> *To:* validation at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* [cabf_validation] Simpler language for 3.2.2.4.6
>
>
> My team was going over the first paragraph of 3.2.2.4.6 that says:
>
>
> "Confirming the Applicant's control over the requested FQDN by 
> confirming the presence of a Request Token or Random Value contained 
> in the content of a file or on a web page in the form of a meta tag 
> one of the following under the "/.well‐known/pki‐validation" 
> directory, or another path registered with IANA for the purpose of 
> Domain Validation, on the Authorization Domain Name that is accessible 
> by HARICA via HTTP/HTTPS over an Authorized Port."
>
> and had a very hard reading and understanding the requirement. This 
> 6-liner sentence is very hard to read, especially for a non-native 
> English speaker and probably needs some language improvement. Could 
> the working group please spend some time and try to make it a little 
> more simple?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dimitris.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20190502/b7dbf314/attachment.html>