[cabf_validation] IP address dates

Tim Hollebeek tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Tue Sep 4 16:44:02 MST 2018


I finally had an opportunity to listen to the Validation WG call from 8/30.


I agree with Ryan that splitting the dates would be a good thing.  I didn't
do that just to keep the ballot simple, but am very open to it.


The date moved from April to June (day that doesn't exist, sorry) solely
because I received comments from one CA suggesting an effective date in
2019.  That seemed way too far way from me.  But given some of the problems
we have had recently with getting ballots passed, I tried to pick a date
that was a compromise between not too far in the future, and a date CAs
could support given that they often have other things they need to be doing.
I'm not horribly picky about what the date is (as long as it's not 2019!!!),
and am encouraged that it sounds like we might be able to agree on an
earlier date.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180904/bfee5f82/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180904/bfee5f82/attachment.p7s>

More information about the Validation mailing list