[cabf_validation] Ambiguities in RFC 6844 regarding CAA resource record sets with no "issue" property tags

[Tim Hollebeek]

Thanks Corey!

 

-Tim

 

From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Corey Bonnell via Validation
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 10:39 AM
To: validation at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabf_validation] Ambiguities in RFC 6844 regarding CAA resource record sets with no "issue" property tags

 

Hello,

Here’s a link to the RFC 6844 ambiguity that we discussed today that I reported to the LAMPS WG last week: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spasm/current/msg01104.html. Links to Quirin’s and Tim’s responses to that email are at the bottom of the page.

 

To support the “two-pronged” approach we discussed on the call, I will work on the language for a new ballot to clear up the RFC’s ambiguity in the BRs as well as create an IETF erratum.

 

Thanks,

Corey 

 

 

 

 

Corey Bonnell

Senior Software Engineer

t: +1 412.395.2233

 

Trustwave | SMART SECURITY ON DEMAND
www.trustwave.com

 

2017 Best Managed Security Service Winner – SC Media

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180118/00544e82/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20180118/00544e82/attachment-0001.p7s>