[cabf_validation] FW: Updated Ballot 190 v2 dated June 29, 2017

[Ben Wilson]

Here is the comment tracking spreadsheet: 

 

 
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uhKyrW9v9dDqgo4sVxoRx5e7sw0GE6zDoYq
eEoE1WiI/edit?usp=sharing>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uhKyrW9v9dDqgo4sVxoRx5e7sw0GE6zDoYqe
EoE1WiI/edit?usp=sharing 

 

I haven't had time to update it with any new comments, so feel free to add
your own as needed.

 

From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
via Public
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
To: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public
Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Mads Egil Henriksveen <Mads.Henriksveen at buypass.no>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Updated Ballot 190 v2 dated June 29, 2017

 

Here is the comment tracking document.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uhKyrW9v9dDqgo4sVxoRx5e7sw0GE6zDoYqe
EoE1WiI/edit?usp=sharing

(If you make any changes, be sure to save a copy of your work locally.)

 

From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via
Public
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:30 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org
<mailto:public at cabforum.org> >
Cc: Mads Egil Henriksveen <Mads.Henriksveen at buypass.no
<mailto:Mads.Henriksveen at buypass.no> >
Subject: [cabfpub] Updated Ballot 190 v2 dated June 29, 2017

 

I am attaching an updated Ballot v2 dated June 29, 2017, which corrects two
typos (the typo corrections are highlighted in yellow in the attached v2
draft):

 

1.  In the definition of Authorized Ports, changed "443 (http)" to "443
(https)".  Mads found this typo.

 

2.  In the Note following Methods 1-10, changed "higher level domain levels"
to "higher level domains".  The first phrase was redundant.

 

This is now the pending ballot.

 

Mads, Ryan, and Jeremy have all raised suggested further changes to BR
3.2.2.4, and the Validation Working Group is committed to taking up the
suggestions as soon as Ballot 190 finishes its process.  We have already
worked two years on this (and on the ten methods), so it will be useful to
finally nail down one version (and finally eliminate "any other method"),
and then use that as a benchmark for further refinement.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170713/529e9900/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4974 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170713/529e9900/attachment.p7s>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170713/529e9900/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4974 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20170713/529e9900/attachment-0001.p7s>