[cabf_validation] Validation Method Revisions - Ballot 169

[J.C. Jones]

Ben,

The updates look fine to me.

Thanks,
J.C.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com> wrote:

> Here are the  changes I received from Jeremy based on our discussions
> during the  F2F in Bilbao.  Plus I inserted the  footnote on examples of
> Request Tokens previously omitted per Question 2 below.
>
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/397d7ce42c29583179848a0af61539e04758feb6
>
>
>
> *From:* validation-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:
> validation-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:53 PM
> *To:* validation at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* [cabf_validation] Validation Method Revisions - Ballot 169
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I created a branch, but then realized that  Peter already had one, so I
> made a change to his version -  see
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/ed50ab8394f6c006896d478e721063b96da8769d
>
>
>
> Question 1 – this doesn’t include any changes made at the  face-to-face,
> were there any?
>
>
>
> Question 2 – I noticed that  the examples of  Request Tokens (at the
> bottom of the document “Domain Validation WG Proposal”) aren’t in this
> draft.  Shouldn’t they be?
>
>
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Validation mailing list
> Validation at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160628/ed18b531/attachment.html