[cabf_validation] Question before we start Ballot 169

[Ben Wilson]

It was originally Jeremy with endorsers of Doug Beattie and Tim Hollebeek.
If they are still willing.  On the question about the definition of "Domain
Name System", maybe we just leave it as is without a BR definition.  

 

From: validation-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 12:38 PM
To: validation (validation at cabforum.org) <validation at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabf_validation] Question before we start Ballot 169

 

On the call today, there were no objections to starting Ballot 169, so I
guess we can.  

 

Ben - the most recent Ballot 169 draft doesn't list the proposer and
endorsers.  Do you remember who that was?

 

Question:  I just noticed that the Ballot (and existing BR 3.2.2.4) uses the
term Domain Name System about six times total, but it is not included in our
Definitions.  (I see we list DNS as an acronym for Domain Name System, and
it's pretty well defined outside of the BRs:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System )

 

Do we care?  Or just go with the Ballot as written now?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160721/bf4e8ac5/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20160721/bf4e8ac5/attachment.bin