[cabf_validation] Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
Doug Beattie
doug.beattie at globalsign.com
Thu Dec 15 11:39:14 MST 2016
I like the list of countries idea - all the CAs would then have the same guidance on how to handle them.
From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Validation
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:35 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>; Bruce Morton <Bruce.Morton at entrustdatacard.com>
Cc: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
Another possibility is to leave state or province as required, but then add:
"State or province is not required for the countries listed on Appendix X"
Then we add places (Taiwan, Monaco, Vatican City, Germany, United Kingdom) as people bring them forward. We could include an initial list with this ballot to avoid having to prepare another ballot to add places.
From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Validation
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:26 AM
To: Bruce Morton <Bruce.Morton at entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org>
Cc: Tim Hollebeek <THollebeek at trustwave.com>
Subject: Re: [cabf_validation] Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
Yes, I like something along those lines.
From: Bruce Morton [mailto:Bruce.Morton at entrustdatacard.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:25 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek; CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List
Subject: RE: Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
How about this?
Required/Optional:
City and country - Required;
State - Required, if verified per Section 11.4.1 as part of the address for the Place of Business;
Street and postal code - Optional
If there is no state or the state is not used as part of the address, then it is not required.
Bruce.
From: Tim Hollebeek [mailto:THollebeek at trustwave.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:19 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List <validation at cabforum.org<mailto:validation at cabforum.org>>
Cc: Bruce Morton <Bruce.Morton at entrustdatacard.com<mailto:Bruce.Morton at entrustdatacard.com>>
Subject: RE: Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
But City + Country is not unique in many common, important cases ("Springfield, United States"), and the state is also important since state laws tend to vary quite a bit in the US ... I think something more in the spirit of the current BRs that does a better job of tightening up what "where applicable" means would be better.
I don't want to lose the requirement that US EV certificates MUST include the state.
-Tim
From: Validation [mailto:validation-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Morton via Validation
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:28 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Validation WG List
Cc: Bruce Morton
Subject: [cabf_validation] Proposed ballot - EV State Optional
Here is a proposed ballot per my action.
Thanks, Bruce.
Background:
There is confusion on whether the state or province OID MUST be included in an EV certificate. EV section 9.2.7 states in one place "State or province (where applicable)" and also "City, state and country - Required."
Since many countries do not have states or provinces and some that do have states or provinces do not use them for their address, it is proposed that inclusion of the state or province OID should be optional.
-- MOTION BEGINS --
Current section 9.2.7 of EV Guidelines:
Required/Optional: City, state, and country - Required; Street and postal code - Optional
Proposed section 9.2.7 of EV Guidelines:
Required/Optional: City and country - Required; Street, state and postal code - Optional
-- MOTION ENDS --
The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on XX, and will close at 2200 UTC on XX. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on XX. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/<https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=8t_S2CLG1RJ6XptDB9PCkT6EtPLjV0eNXVqfzYQ53A&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fcabforum%2eorg%2fmembers%2f>
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is currently nine (9) members- at least nine members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
________________________________
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
________________________________
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20161215/c4772f01/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Validation
mailing list