[Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins | SC-079v2 - Allow more than one Certificate Policy in a Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate
Scott Rea
scott.rea at emudhra.com
Fri Oct 4 20:55:05 UTC 2024
eMudhra votes YES on Ballot SC-079v2
From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Date: Monday, 30 September 2024 at 5:08 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins | SC-079v2 - Allow more than one Certificate Policy in a Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate
CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not open the links or the attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
### Purpose of the Ballot
This ballot duplicates the content of section 7.1.2.10.5 (CA Certificate Certificate Policies) into section 7.1.2.2 (Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate Profile) as section 7.1.2.2.6 (Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate Certificate Policies), modifying the requirement from "MUST contain exactly one Reserved Certificate Policy Identifier" to "MUST include at least one Reserved Certificate Policy Identifier. If any Subscriber Certificates will chain up directly to the Certificate issued under this Certificate Profile, this Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate MUST contain exactly one Reserved Certificate Policy Identifier". This change allows the inclusion of multiple Reserved Certificate Policy Identifiers in a Cross-Certified Subordinate CA Certificate, except when any Subscriber Certificates chain up directly to the Certificate issued under this Certificate Profile.
Additionally, the description of the `policyIdentifier` contents was updated for clarification in both sections.
The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and endorsed by Ben Wilson (Mozilla) and Thomas Zermeno (SSL.com).
### Motion begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" ("TLS Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.7 as specified in the following redline:
- https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...e808034e0c8889884761a2e591bb562f86b858c3
### Motion ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (7+ days)
- Start time: 2024-09-22 19:10 UTC
- End time: 2024-09-2919:10 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
- Start time: 2024-09-30 11:10 UTC
- End time: 2024-10-07 11:10 UTC
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system.
Disclaimer: The email and its contents hold confidential information and are intended for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited as per Company Policy, you are requested to notify the sender and delete the email and associated attachments with it from your system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20241004/cea3dbcd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Servercert-wg
mailing list