[Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)]

HARICA votes "no" to ballot SC-74.

Dimitris.

On 5/5/2024 12:06 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
> HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-74.
>
> On 5/5/2024 11:24 π.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via 
> Servercert-wg wrote:
>> Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
>>
>>
>>   SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
>>
>>
>>     Summary
>>
>> The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
>>
>> /"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST 
>> be structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all 
>> material required by RFC 3647."/
>>
>> The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS 
>> documents contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and 
>> compare against the BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the 
>> actual structure that CAs should follow. After several discussions in 
>> the SCWG Public Mailing List 
>> <https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html> 
>> and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to 
>> the existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in 
>> section 6 of RFC 3647.
>>
>> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos 
>> (HARICA) and endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek 
>> (Digicert).
>>
>> You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here 
>> <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503>.
>>
>>
>>     Motion Begins
>>
>> MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
>> Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as 
>> specified in the following redline:
>>
>>   * https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae
>>
>>
>>
>>     Motion Ends
>>
>> This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for 
>> approval of this ballot is as follows:
>>
>>
>>         Discussion (at least 7 days)
>>
>>   * Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
>>   * End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>         Vote for approval (7 days)
>>
>>   * Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
>>   * End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Servercert-wg mailing list
>> Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240509/7a4c1ace/attachment.html>