[Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Tim Hollebeek
tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Thu May 9 15:13:32 UTC 2024
DigiCert votes NO on Ballot SC-74.
The ballot is insufficiently clear about whether punctuation, capitalization,
etc have to match exactly, and RFC 3647, which is Informative and was never
intended to be used this way, is inconsistent itself in its use of
capitalization and punctuation.
There needs to be additional clarity about exactly what the requirements are
if we want to do this.
-Tim
From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:24 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS
structure according to RFC 3647
Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required
by RFC 3647."
The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS
documents contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare
against the BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure
that CAs should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing
List
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzozYzI2MWQxMjUxYTQyZjkzZjc5ZTc2YWM0MDc3NmJhNzo2OjBhNTk6YTQwZDgwNmE5Y2VkY2QwMTc1MTQyYTk2MTIyNTVmODBhNTM0YzIzOTI3MzE2ZDgwMDg3ZmVhMTAyMjcxZGQ2ODpoOkY>
and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC
3647.
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).
You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzozYzI2MWQxMjUxYTQyZjkzZjc5ZTc2YWM0MDc3NmJhNzo2OmRmMzM6MDJlYjIwNGZmZjg3NjExOWMzM2IyODU3MjM3NGNjMWU0ZjBhYzExOTRhZmZmZjE5ZjY0OTZmNmU0YTljNmIyYjpoOkY>
.
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified
in the following redline:
*
https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzozYzI2MWQxMjUxYTQyZjkzZjc5ZTc2YWM0MDc3NmJhNzo2OmIzOTE6ZDUwNjAwMjUzNmFmM2Y4YzAwNTc2NmVjODkwNWRkYjM4YWY5ODE3NmMzYWI5OTBmOTJkNGZmOWJmODc1MDA4NTp0OkY
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzozYzI2MWQxMjUxYTQyZjkzZjc5ZTc2YWM0MDc3NmJhNzo2OjQzY2I6YjYyNzliYTI4Y2FlZWVmNjMyYjg3ZGRkZDVlMDg5NjNjZmY2ZjBlZjA0YzE5ZGM0NDllNmQxNGJlYTI0MDIzNzpoOkY>
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval
of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
* Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
* End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
* Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
* End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240509/709fb4e4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5231 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240509/709fb4e4/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the Servercert-wg
mailing list