[Servercert-wg] Weekly github digest (Server Certificate Working Group)

[Infrastructure Bot]

Issues
------
* cabforum/servercert (+2/-3/💬13)
  2 issues created:
  - Update to description of certificateHold  (by dougbeattie)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/506 
  - Making CRLs required and OCSP Optional (by dougbeattie)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/505 

  7 issues received 13 new comments:
  - #506 Update to description of certificateHold  (5 by clintwilson, dougbeattie, robstradling, timfromdigicert)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/506 
  - #505 Making CRLs required and OCSP Optional (3 by XolphinMartijn, clintwilson, wthayer)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/505 
  - #229 BRs: Clarify what "an appropriate way" means for wildcards and gTLDs (1 by dzacharo)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/229 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements] 
  - #193 Standardize on date format for date of incorporation or registration (1 by barrini)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/193 [ev-guidelines] 
  - #187 Baseline Requirements: Should Technically Constrained Sub CAs require a Key Generation report? (1 by barrini)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/187 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements] 
  - #160 Baseline Requirements: nameConstraints definition is ambiguous (1 by barrini)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/160 [baseline-requirements] 
  - #153 Clarify validation requirements for .arpa (1 by barrini)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/153 [baseline-requirements] [validation-sc] 

  3 issues closed:
  - BR Certificate Policy OIDS are no longer optional https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/248 [baseline-requirements] [clean-up] 
  - BRs: Clarify what "an appropriate way" means for wildcards and gTLDs https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/229 [enhancement] [baseline-requirements] 
  - Baseline Requirements: Clarify the allowed fields for issuer names https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/154 [baseline-requirements] 



Pull requests
-------------
* cabforum/servercert (+3/-1/💬1)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - SC-067 V2: Require Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration (Version 2) (by ChristopherRC)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/507 
  - SC-071 V2 - Incorporating V1 feedback (by DustinHollenback-Microsoft)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/504 
  - Ballot SC74: Clarify that CAs must follow the outline of Section 6 of RFC 3647 for CP/CPS documents (by dzacharo)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503 [baseline-requirements] [ballot] 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #487 SC-067: Require Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration (Version 1) (1 by ChristopherRC)
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/487 [ballot] 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - SC-071 V2 - Incorporating V1 feedback
    https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/504 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/cabforum/servercert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240428/535f9c4b/attachment-0001.html>