[Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

[Tom Zermeno]

Understood. We will be sure to submit our votes within the designated period for future ballots. 

 

 

From: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 6:50 AM
To: Tom Zermeno <tom at ssl.com>; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>; Paul van Brouwershaven <Paul.vanBrouwershaven at entrust.com>
Subject: RE: [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

 

Sorry, this vote can´t be counted because arrived past the end time.

 

De: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> > En nombre de Tom Zermeno via Servercert-wg
Enviado el: lunes, 1 de abril de 2024 16:37
Para: Paul van Brouwershaven <Paul.vanBrouwershaven at entrust.com <mailto:Paul.vanBrouwershaven at entrust.com> >; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

SSL.com votes “Yes” on ballot SC-72.

 

From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 7:01 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

 

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing the exceptions to policyQualifiers​ in section 9.7, to align them with the Baseline Requirements (BRs).

 

The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).

 

--- Motion Begins ---

 

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on version 1.8.1:

 

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following redline: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122 

 

--- Motion Ends ---

 

Discussion (at least 7 days):

- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC

- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

 

Vote for approval (7 days):

- Start: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC

- End: 2024-04-01 12:00 UTC

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240402/6b44ecb8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5934 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240402/6b44ecb8/attachment-0001.p7s>