[Servercert-wg] Message

[Dean Coclin]

One of the new Interested Party members tried to post to the group but it
bounced. I've asked Wayne to look at it but in the meantime, I'm reposting
the message for him:

 

I'd like to start some discussion on the WG's opinions of CAA for Tor hidden
services, using my draft-ietf-acme-onion
<https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/cNl2iFrs>  and my Tor Spec proposal
343-rend-caa <https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/YAae97pn> , as part of the ACME
for Onions <https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/wi4TBMXN>  project.

 

Specifically:

- is this something the WG likes?

- should CAA checking be required for Tor?

 

 

Thanks,

Q Misell

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230727/51f7ff2a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230727/51f7ff2a/attachment.p7s>