[Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

[Corey Bonnell]

Thanks, Inigo. If a list of tables with problematic formatting is created,
I’d be happy to tackle. I’m pretty bad at typesetting, so I’d prefer others
who have a better sense for design to come up with this list.

 

Thanks,

Corey

 

 

 

From: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 11:24 AM
To: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com>; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>; Corey
Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com>
Subject: RE: Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

This is to fix some table formats, for example, those in sections:
7.1.2.10.2, 7.1.4.2, 


 

De: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org
<mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> > En nombre de Inigo Barreira
via Servercert-wg
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de julio de 2023 17:19
Para: Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com
<mailto:Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com> >; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org
<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

 
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.cabf
orum.org%2Fbooks%2Finfrastructure%2Fpage%2Fdocument-markdown-guidelines&data
=05%7C01%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7Cb8c50ea79f7e4679191b08db886b86d7%7
C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638253767650066328%7CUnknown%7CT
WFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mlwTLU2n%2FQJkdYtsPfMxv7kcxz3kBqDOFRgEgjUHMGg%3D&res
erved=0> Document Markdown Guid... | CABF Wiki (cabforum.org)

 

De: Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com
<mailto:Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com> > 
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de julio de 2023 17:17
Para: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com
<mailto:Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com> >; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org
<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Asunto: RE: Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

Hi Inigo,

I haven’t on Infra calls in several months (I have a standing meeting
conflict on Wednesdays, so I’m unable to attend) and I don’t see any GitHub
issue in the servercert repo regarding this issue, so I’m not sure what
problem currently exists regarding table formatting.

 

Do you have any pointer on what we’re looking to fix?

 

Thanks,

Corey

 

From: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com
<mailto:Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com> > 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com
<mailto:Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com> >; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG
Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org
<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Subject: RE: Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

Corey, would it be possible to add to this “profiles cleanup ballot” what
was discussed the other day in the infra SC about the “-“ to format
correctly the tables generated in section 7?

 

De: Servercert-wg < <mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org>
servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> En nombre de Corey Bonnell via
Servercert-wg
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de julio de 2023 16:17
Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <
<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

Hello,

While adding support for SC-62 linting for TLS certificates in pkilint, a
few issues were identified with the current language in section 6 and 7 of
the BRs. To address these issues, I created a draft ballot on Github. The
draft ballot text can be viewed here:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/SC63..CBonnell:servercert:sc6
2-cleanup
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
m%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2FSC63..CBonnell%3Aservercert%3Asc62-cle
anup&data=05%7C01%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7Cb8c50ea79f7e4679191b08db8
86b86d7%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638253767650066328%7CUn
known%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX
VCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hlX6jocUlgqJZ7LWjl2vpU78CD5p4yc5h4pBuhWms84
%3D&reserved=0> .

 

Chris Clements of the Chrome team reviewed and offered to endorse, so we’re
looking for one more endorser to push this ballot forward.

 

Please let me know if you have any feedback on the proposed language or if
you’d be willing to endorse.

 

Thanks,

Corey

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230719/3c6be8b5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5257 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230719/3c6be8b5/attachment-0001.p7s>