[Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

[Inigo Barreira]

Hi Tim,

 

See attached redlined and current versions. I just used what Martijn
suggested yesterday but let me know if this is what you were looking for.

 

Regards

 

De: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com> 
Enviado el: lunes, 28 de agosto de 2023 19:49
Para: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com>; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Asunto: RE: SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

Thanks for doing this Inigo . I know re-organizations like this are a lot of
work and fall very much in the category of "important but not fun".  So
thanks for taking an initial stab at this.

 

Is there a mapping that shows where all the original text ended up?  I think
that's going to be essential for people to be able to review this.  I did
some spot checking, and your conversion looks pretty good, but I wasn't able
to do a more detailed review without a mapping.

 

-Tim

 

From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org
<mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Inigo Barreira
via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 5:20 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> >
Subject: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format
pre-ballot

 

Hello,

The current Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) are written in a
non-standardized format. For many years it has been discussed to convert
this document into the RFC 3647 format and follow the standardized model for
this type of documents. 

 

Given that this has been known for several years, I have prepared the
following ballot text, which converts the EVGs into the RFC 3647 format:

EVGs based on RFC3647 by barrini . Pull Request #440 . cabforum/servercert
(github.com)

 

I am currently seeking two endorsers as well as any feedback on the ballot
content itself (wording, effective dates, etc.).

 

Thanks,

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230829/c9d90e17/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EVG-redline.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 493780 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230829/c9d90e17/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EVG.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 273294 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230829/c9d90e17/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6853 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230829/c9d90e17/attachment-0001.p7s>