[Servercert-wg] Draft SCWG agenda - April 27 11:30 ET

[Inigo Barreira]

Sure, not a problem. I´ll add it to the agenda

 

De: Ryan Dickson <ryandickson at google.com> 
Enviado el: lunes, 24 de abril de 2023 16:27
Para: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com>; CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Asunto: Re: [Servercert-wg] Draft SCWG agenda - April 27 11:30 ET

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Hi Inigo, 

 

Would it please be possible to add a ~5 minute discussion re: the format of the BRs now that the contents of SC-62 have been added <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FCA-Browser-Forum-BR-v2.0.0.pdf&data=05%7C01%7CInigo.Barreira%40sectigo.com%7C6a2704b305ce4368ab2808db44d002dc%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638179433104065392%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fxd0Xelo1SlQZBx41K9vGuH%2BoG3q5DH3wWk4qQGqRB8%3D&reserved=0> ? While the profile tables presented cleanly in Markdown, things are a bit harder for me to read in the PDF version. I'd like to understand if others have the same concern, and quickly brainstorm possible solutions.

 

Thanks for your consideration,

Ryan

 

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:35 AM Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> > wrote:

Here is the draft agenda for the subject call. Feel free to add any other topic to be discussed.

 

Server Certificate Working Group Agenda – 27 April 2023

1.	Roll Call and Begin Recording (* not needed)
2.	Read Antitrust Statement  (* not needed)
3.	Review Agenda 
4.	Minutes:

*	16 March: published
*	30 March: not ready yet
*	13 April: circulated within management list on 13/4

5.	Certificate consumers moratorium

*	Update, if needed (Dimitris included in the previous call)

6.	Issues to discuss:

*	GitHub issues

1.	Continue with the review of the open issues

7.	Ballot Status – see list below
8.	Any Other Business
9.	Next call: 11 May
10.	Adjourn

CURRENT STATUS OF BALLOTS 

*	Passed

*	None

*	Failed

*	None

*	Voting Period

*	None

*	Discussion Period

*	None

*	Review Period 

*	None

*	Draft / Under Consideration

*	SC59 – Revival of Debian Weak Keys Ballot - Chris Kemmerer (SSL.com)
*	SCXX – SLO/Response for CRL & OCSP Responses - David Kluge (Google) / Clint Wilson (Apple): on hold
*	SCXX – Make OCSP optional, require CRLs – Chris (Google). On hold?
*	SCXX – Clean-up ballot

*	Fix inconsistencies between BRs and EVGs
*	ISO 3166 (allow 3 characters) in EVG 9.2.8
*	Typo in section 7.2.2 of the BRs
*	Changing titles in BRs and EVGs to reflect that are for TLS cert types

 

_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:Servercert-wg at cabforum.org> 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fservercert-wg&data=05%7C01%7CInigo.Barreira%40sectigo.com%7C6a2704b305ce4368ab2808db44d002dc%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638179433104065392%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DA4zeLKFb6LvY%2BdPiqxxDZEMAi3pOfZyderC3NtQTm4%3D&reserved=0> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230424/47767044/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6853 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230424/47767044/attachment-0001.p7s>